This is the woman who established what came to be Planned Parenthood. People today tend to praise her as a person for being in support of birth control and a woman's right of choice. Sounds good, on the surface.
I know people who have used the services of Planned Parenthood. What's ironic is that most of these people are outspoken in their support of things like "Black Lives Matter" and live by the code of being black and proud. They are living in selective ignorance.
When we are taught by the media and mainstream social programming to use words like "reproductive rights" and "my body, my choice", we forget the ugly side of things. Arguing against a person's "rights" and "choice" sounds bossy and totalitarian. But let's look at things a different way.
Killing outside of law and justice is wrong, true, or false?
If a person is allowed to do away with an unwanted fetus, why not allow them to do away with an unwanted 2-year-old? (And let's leave rape and incest out of this one, if it pleases you.)
If we have access to rights, do we have an obligation to responsibility?
If it is your right to choose to terminate a pregnancy, is it your responsibility to practice careful sex?
If you can be frank enough to talk freely about your abortion or random sex activities, can you be frank enough to call abortion what it really is?
People like to say that we have "evolved" as a society. We are so free with our "evolution" that we have more fun words for sin. Instead of having sex outside of marriage, it sounds much more normal and "okay" to call it "hooking up", "Netflix and chilling", etc.
Sin has been given a free pass today. You aren't allowed to call someone a "slut" or "easy" without being damned for it. These days, society turns the tables on you when you call out sexual sin. They will "cancel you". They will try to shame you for "slut-shaming" instead of admitting that there is such a thing as a slut. If you are acting like a slut, why are you bothered with being called a slut?
If you believe that homosexuality is morally wrong, you can no longer say that. If you do, you could face being charged with "hate speech" or committing a "hate crime". But the gay person isn't going to be charged for committing sodomy.
It is no longer acceptable to just be civil to gay people. For a while, we were told to be "tolerant" (and I was never hostile to gay people) but now we are being forced to be accepting. I will never be accepting of sin, no matter how accepting I am to a person.
By the way, Satan pulled a good one when he managed to equate the moral sin of homosexuality with being of a minority race. If you are a racial minority you will be shamed for "picking on" the LGBTQ community. Do you know how this happens? Money. The LGBTQ community has money - lots of it - lobbyists and power. Lots of power. Politicians and laws tend to flow with the money.
So all this personal "freedom" to sin comes from years of programming and putting things into play, bit by bit. And yet, getting back to Margaret Sanger, most people have no idea what she was actually about.
Sanger wanted to see a decrease in the birth of blacks. She rode hard with eugenicists. She found certain groups "unfit" to have children - not unfit because of abuse but because of economic and educational status.
These days, Planned Parenthood is trying to distance itself from Sanger. However, they were founded on her principles and ideas. Maybe what they are really doing is trying not to look as awful as they are.
Peace
--Free
